View AbstractIn this paper, I investigate echo-wh-questions in Turaif dialect o f Arabic (TA).
The paper reveals some novel facts concerning the syntax o f echo-wh-questions
in TA. In TA, the wh-word in echo-wh questions appears in the left periphery o f
the clause higher than the wh-word o f non-echo-wh-questions; which is strange if
we take into account the results o f other studies done on echo questions in
languages like English, Spanish, and Russian among other languages where it is
claimed that the echo-wh-word always appears in situ inside the Utterance headed
by a C(=Ceq) that takes the U as its complement where the CP of the utterance is
being frozen), Sobin ((1978, 1992, 2009 ,2010) among others) and the echo-whword
is being bound by the superior Ceq. Being exempted from locality
restriction, island constraints, Ross (1967), and the issue o f scope as well as being
exempted from superiority effect, I argue that wh-word in those echo-whquestions
is base generated in its surface position in the left periphery o f the
clause in the Echo Phrase (EP). I argue, under the Minimalist Approach Chomsky
(1993, 1995, 2000) that the wh-word in the echo-wh-questions is directly merged
in the Echo Phrase (EP) since merging is more economical than move. However,
I conclude this paper by hypothesizing that there exists a speculative stage in which the wh-word is split into two items a wh-word (wh) and a reusmpive
pronoun (RP), (wh+RP); I assume the wh-word directly merges to check the EP
in the left periphery o f the clause and the resumptive pronoun merges to check
the phi-features on the verb. The contribution of the paper lies in the fact that it
investigates echo questions in a dialect that is, to my knowledge, heretofore
uninvestigated; and adds to our understanding o f the syntax o f echo questions.